This page contains supplementary material for "The concavity effect is a compound of local and global effects" by Joachim Vandekerckhove, Sven Panis, and Johan Wagemans ().

This site contains resources that may not be archival or reviewed. The files made available here may not be what they seem at first sight. Please do not cite without consulting the authors.


Using a change detection paradigm, Barenholtz, Cohen, Feldman, and Singh (2003) found that changes in concave regions of a contour are more easily detected than changes in convex regions. In a series of three experiments, we investigated this concavity effect using the same paradigm. We observed the effect in wire-like stimuli as well as in silhouettes (Experiment 1) and in complex, smoothed images as opposed to angular polygons (Experiment 2). We also observed a systematic effect of the magnitude of the change (Experiment 1). Furthermore, we find that the effect cannot be attributed to either local or global processing effects, but rather to a combination of both "mere" concaveness and an effect due to changes in the perceived part structure of the stimulus object (Experiment 3). For our data analysis, we used a nonparametric bootstrap method, which greatly increases sensitivity (compared to more traditional analyses like ANOVA).

disclaimer By clicking on any of these links (including, but not limited to, the downloading of any PDF file from any server), you agree to forfeit and cede on your own behalf and on behalf of any past, current, or future employer, any exclusive claim to intellectual property or copyright relating to any of the materials so obtained.